🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include several five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's injunction that had invalidated the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and upsetting the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its ruling.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the districts drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She stated that it undermined the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action is part of a nationwide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Usually, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State AG welcomed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives lamented the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior House leader argued the court had another time shredded its credibility by approving a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.