🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the carefully constructed image circulated by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although he is called Mikhail, the implication is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a popular book sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a selection process with no shortage of contenders. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the country in practice.

• His list featured various figures, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the events stated the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his “recruitment work” in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and social media to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star popular with viewers there, the authorities will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.