🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a draft bill that include lowering the recommended coverage of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for various offences “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We reside in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Further, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which includes increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.